A Citizen’s response to mass rape of men by feminists

In response to The Yahoo / India Times Opinion Poll wrt the Shiney Ahuja Rape Case

RAPE, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & DOWRY AREN’T THESE THE TOOLS THAT GIVE A WOMAN ALMIGHTY & UNFETTERED POWERS, IF HER DEMANDS ARE NOT MET WITH…????????

WHO DECIDES WHAT ACTUALLY TRANSPIRES WITHIN THE CONFINES OF A BEDROOM???

There was an article earlier wherein the supreme court has even gone on to state that even in the absence of clinching evidence as that of semen samples, rape can be established merely on the allegation of the woman…

WHY ARE CRIMES OF THE LIKE OF RAPE, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & DOWRY ONLY AFFORDED BY WOMEN??? WHERE IS THE QUESTION OF JUSTICE THEN???

YOU BRAND A MAN GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT WHY CAN’T THE SAME RULE APPLY TO A WOMAN???

AREN’T THESE THE SAME WOMEN THAT FIGHT TOOTH & NAIL FOR EQUALITY & LIBERATION, WHY THEN THE DUAL STANDARDS???

In the case in question, considering the woman (ALLEGED VICTIM) claims to have been Raped several times on previous occasions, strangely she didn’t find it appropriate in bringing it to the attention of the Lady of the House 1st, as also to the law, instead has bided her time in possibly making extortion demands culminating in her current theory…This being true ONLY IF there was ANY SEXUAL relationship, between the 2.

On another note, the State Forensic department has opinioned RAPE by virtue of the ALLEGED VICTIMS Hymen being broken; I wonder did the State Forensic Department make it their business to check the condition of the said woman’s Hymen before she took up employment???

And Finally WHAT CREDIBILITY DOES THE WOMAN HAVE AS COMPARED TO HER EMPLOYER??? As considering her theory of being Raped on a multiplicity of occasions, she strangely has decided to CRY RAPE only now… Why not earlier??? Isn’t it a case of her being smitten by an icon from Bollywood, who being sexually active would have flaunted & offered herself on the numerous earlier occasions as she claims, and then eventually decided that she could extort monies from a celebrity as he would have a lot more to lose than she would, given the stark difference in their social & civil backgrounds.

Moreover assuming that she did have multiple sexual encounters with her employer on earlier occasions, the same would have most certainly been consensual, as if they weren’t, she had ample opportunity in either leaving his employment basis her allegations, failing which if he had infact to RAPE her as the word suggests, she would have manifested her complaint on the very 1st occasion, whereby there would have been several physical manifestations of non-consensual intercourse. All this underwritten by the fact that she had the benefit of walking away from any perceived provocation as the precursor to any carnal desire is a base form of courting…WHICH SHE OBVIOUSLY & THOROUGHLY WOULD HAVE ENJOYED TILL SUCH TIME THAT SHE DECIDED THAT SHE COULD CAPATALIZE ON…!

AND TO THIS END SOCIETY & LAW BRANDS A MAN A CRIMINAL???????????????

In answer to NCW’s comment for Fast Track Court.

Isn’t it ironic that in the same breath of advocating justice by way of a Fast Track Court, she uses words like “allege & accused” which are in stark contrast to her line of Shiney Ahuja being proved innocent…! If its an allegation or an accusation shouldn’t the onus of proof lie in trying to prove him guilty ??? That too with Credible Hard core evidence & not mere speculation or hearsay…

Just because a woman decides to Cry Rape, interestingly after her claims of being raped several times on earlier occasions??? And then you have the forensic departments drawing conclusions by virtue of a ruptured Hymen….! Was there a Forensic test to establish an intact Hymen before the alleged victim cried Rape??? And who decides when Sex is consensual & when it is Rape??? The Victim??? Why wasn’t Rape cried before, on the very 1st instant??? But it’s considered Rape now??? Or was it considered Rape only after demands to exploit were not met with???

WHO WILL EVER KNOW THE TRUTH??? WITNESSES…! WERE THERE ANY BEHIND THE CLOSED DOORS…???

India Times Comment:

Isn’t it ironic that in the same breath of advocating justice by way of a Fast Track Court, the NCW chairperson uses words like “allege & accused” which are in stark contrast to her line of Shiney Ahuja being proved innocent…! If its an allegation or an accusation shouldn’t the onus of proof lie in trying to prove him guilty ??? That too with Credible Hard core evidence & not mere speculation or hearsay…

Just because a woman decides to Cry Rape, interestingly after her claims of being raped several times on earlier occasions??? And then you have the forensic departments drawing conclusions by virtue of a ruptured Hymen….! Was there a Forensic test to establish an intact Hymen before the alleged victim cried Rape??? And who decides when Sex is consensual & when it is Rape??? The Victim??? Why wasn’t Rape cried before, on the very 1st instant??? But it’s considered Rape now??? Or was it considered Rape only after demands to exploit were not met with???

Women like to sympathize if not Empathize with their own, but do you forget that you do have Men in your lives who rightfully or wrongfully could also become victims of circumstances, wouldn’t you then like the Truth to prevail before being the 1st to hurl your stone at the perpetrator???

WHO WILL EVER KNOW THE TRUTH??? WITNESSES…! WERE THERE ANY BEHIND THE CLOSED DOORS…???

JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED BUT IT MUST BE JUSTICE !

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s